Thursday, 28 February 2013

Advertising: How to test for it

Concept Testing in
Qualitative Marketing Research

Concept testing finds out people’s reactions to proposed products or advertising.

You show respondents your ideas and explore their reactions. You find out their perceptions, opinions, beliefs, and desires about your concepts.

You test product, service, and advertising ideas.

A test is a preliminary screen. You sort out the good ideas from the bad, based on reactions. You screen ideas before you spend much time and money developing products or advertising.

Use concept tests to
  • Screen early concepts
  • Select the most promising concepts for development


In new product development, present your new product ideas to prospects. Watch and listen to how prospects react. They tell you what they like and dislike.

In advertising and creative development, present ads to prospects. Prospects react to headlines, copy, and images. They tell you what words and images they like, and the ones they dislike. They tell what they don’t understand.

How to Conduct Concept Testing - Focus Groups or Depth Interviews

Show people your concepts and interview them. Respondents read, watch, or listen to concepts. Then ask them to interact with the concepts.

There are several ways to show concepts.
  • Product concept statements
  • Pictures, videos, illustrations, websites
  • Product samples or prototypes
  • Advertising copy


A concept statement is a written description of a new product or service. It is less than one page, usually a paragraph or two. It is a factual description of a product or service and its features. Images, pictures, or illustrations usually accompany the concept statement.

Product samples are working products or nonworking models. Respondents see and touch the sample.

Advertising copy are samples of proposed ads. Ads consist of headlines, body copy, and images. Ads are print, video, or audio.

With written concept statements and print advertising, you get people to interact with the concepts. You ask them to write about the concepts.
You ask them to
  • Circle words, phrases, and sentences they like.
  • Cross out words, phrases, and sentences they dislike.
  • Place questions marks on things they find confusing.
  • Write comments on images.
  • Rate how unique and different the concept is.
  • Give an overall grade to the concept… A, B, C, D, F.
  • Rate how likely they would buy.
  • Estimate how much they would pay.


After respondents mark up concepts, examine their markups to gain deeper understanding. Then follow up and probe.

With video, audio or product samples, give respondents a survey. Hand out the survey when you show each concept.

You also follow up and probe, as in concept statements.

When to Introduce Concept Testing - At the Beginning

Introduce concepts right at the beginning of an interview or focus group, after the introduction to the interview.

Ask respondents to write before they talk.

That way, you will cut down on bias, which is a slanted, skewed, or influenced view. You reduce group bias and reference bias about concepts.

In focus groups, some respondents influence other respondents. When you introduce concepts at the beginning, and ask people to write before they talk, you avoid group bias.

When you conduct depth interviews, you don’t have to worry about group bias. But when you conduct depth interviews, you need to reduce reference bias.

Respondents develop a frame of reference from a question or discussion. They carry the reference to the next question. The reference influences answers.

Cut out reference bias by introducing concepts at the beginning of the depth interview. Let respondents write before you and let them talk about substance.

The Number of Concepts – Bias and Fatigue

Sometimes you have more than one concept to show. When you finish talking about the first concept, you move to the next one.

But previous concepts are another form of reference bias that influence respondents.

To reduce reference bias with several concepts, rotate the order of the concepts with each interview. Rotating order reduces bias.

Three concepts in a focus group or depth interview are about the limit. Too many concepts produce concept fatigue in the respondent.

Another way to reduce reference bias is to show only one concept in an interview. This is monadic testing… a dry research term for a single concept test. If you have several concepts to test, and you show a single concept in a depth interview, you need several interviews. And that pushes up costs.

What They Say and Do in Concept Testing – Beware

What people say and do are often different. Statements and actions often contradict each other.

Concepts and concepts are abstract; they are easy to talk about. When respondents finish talking about concepts, concepts vanish from their minds. They evaporate. Concepts don’t require respondents’ commitment. They don’t pay for concepts and don’t use them.

So, be wary about concept reactions and answers.

Be on guard for overstatement in qualitative marketing research.

Dig deep, challenge, and weigh what you see and hear. Don’t let rosy answers carry you away. Don’t use concept tests for forecasting sales. Be skeptical. Be a detective. Investigate some more.

Once you’ve screened good concepts, use them to develop and test products. Product usage is the decisive test.

The same holds true for ads. The only real way to know if ads sell is to test and measure them in a market test.

Use focus groups or depth interviews for concept testing. They are a preliminary screen and generate new perspectives.


 

Advertising: What to test for

Concept Test 7 Advertising Elements
and Improve Ads

A concept test in qualitative advertising research elicits reactions from respondents in focus groups or depth interviews.

You can use it to evaluate seven elements in advertising.

There are seven elements in persuasive ads. Each element is important. They work together to persuade and convince.

Advertising ElementsElement Purpose
HeadlineGets attention
Promises benefitsBuilds interest
Pictures the outcome of benefitsBuilds interest
Shows proof Builds desire
Differentiates Builds desire
Makes an offer Builds desire
Calls for action Causes action



The headline is the most important part of the ad. Its purpose is to grab attention and get people to read, watch, or listen to the rest of the ad. If the headline does its job, it attracts interested people and gets them to pay attention. If the headline fails, it loses people and sales.

Headlines have a few seconds to grab attention. So, they must be powerful. Good headlines promise specific benefits, strike emotional chords, stir up curiosity, and ignite urgency. Use a concept test to assess headlines.

After the headline, the ad promises important benefits. People buy features and benefits that satisfy personal emotions and beliefs.

The ad shows people enjoying the benefits. It describes or shows a picture of users achieving emotional goals… happiness, health, admiration, knowledge, success, wealth. The emotional benefits are the outcome of the functional benefits.

Keep in mind, positive emotions outsell negative emotions. Happiness, curiosity, surprise, and acceptance are positive.

The ad also proves claims and sets up credibility. A well-known brand may be proof enough. An unknown brand works harder at proving. An unknown brand offers testimonials, specific features, and extra incentives. It must build trust.

The ad also distinguishes the product or service. It positions the product against competitors and describes the unique selling proposition.

The ad makes an offer. An offer shows value. It cements desire.

The ad’s call to action tells people what to do next. It tells them how to buy. The call to action is specific and clear. Often, it includes incentives to incite immediate action.

Persuasive ads are deceptively simple, yet they follow a proven formula, tested over the span of a hundred years in advertising. Apply the seven elements of persuasive ads in your marketing communications.

Use a concept test to evaluate ads in focus groups or depth interviews. Test each of the seven elements in an ad.

Test ads to find winners. Test to understand concerns. Testing concepts avoids expensive mistakes.

Research - focus group questions (1)

Focus Group Questionnaire Fundamentals - Basic Questions

Basic questions are tools in qualitative research.
Write them in the focus group questionnaire - the moderator's guide. And ask them.
A question is an inquiry that produces data. And data leads to information and knowledge.

We'll examine five different types of basic questions.
  • Open-ended questions
  • Closed questions
  • Follow-up questions
  • Probing questions
  • Prompted questions


Let's take a look.
Open-Ended Questions

Open-ended questions are the stock and trade of qualitative marketing research.

They allow people to answer in any way they see fit. Open-ended questions do not impose answers on people. They allow expression.

So, use open-ended questions often and widely in focus groups and depth interviews.

Open-ended questions start conversations and keep them going.

Examples of open-ended questions:
“When you think about green energy, what is the first thing that comes to mind?”

“What do you like best about product X?”

“What are the biggest problems with brand X?”

“What brands come to mind?”

Open-ended questions can discover unknown topics and explore them. They can produce rich, deep, and unexpected answers.

Open-ended questions take the form of a question or imperative. For example,
Question: “What car do you drive?”

Imperative: “Please tell me which car you drive.”

Closed Questions

In contrast, closed questions impose answers and limit expression.

Closed questions are the stock and trade of quantitative surveys. They allow researchers to count answers and apply statistical techniques. Researchers measure, size, and forecast using closed questions.

A closed question restricts or narrows answers. In this example, the answer is either yes or no.
"Do you use brand X?”

Other examples of closed questions include quantitative survey questions, which provide a range of answers.

In qualitative research, closed questions help clarify and confirm something specific.

The Four-Question Sequence

You use open-ended questions to explore, discover, and expand.

Then, you dig beyond top-of-the-mind answers. A method to dig beyond the top of the mind is to use the four-question sequence.
The four-question sequence consists typically of four parts.

  1. Main question (usually open-ended)
  2. Follow-up questions
  3. Probing questions
  4. Prompted questions


Here is how it works:

You start with a main question and listen for its answer.

Then you follow up and inquire about the answer.

Then you probe to clarify.

And, if necessary, you prompt. A prompt is a cue or aide.

Main Question

The main question is an open-ended question. It starts a discussion about a subject.

For example,
“Please think about smart-phones. What comes to mind?”

There are typically several main questions within each general topic. For example, you may have five main questions under the topic of awareness.

Write main questions in the focus group questionnaire - moderator's guide.
Follow-Up Questions

The follow-up question inquires about the answer to the main question.

It gets details and expands answers. Often there are several follow-up questions to one main question.

Here is an example,

Main question
“What is the biggest problem with brand X?”

Follow-up questions
“How significant is the problem?”

“What causes the problem?”

Anticipate follow-up questions. Write them into your interview guide. Here are some categories of follow-up questions.

When you hear facts, ask what the facts mean.
"What does that mean?”

When you hear situations or events, ask about causes and outcomes.
“How did it happen?”

When you hear problems, ask about causes, ramifications, importance, and solutions.
“What causes the problem?”

When you hear about things that affect people, ask about response.
“What did you do?”

The interviewer writes follow-up questions in the interview guide. Or improvise follow-up questions during the discussion.

Write follow-up questions until they become a habit.Write them in the focus group questionnaire. Then improvise during conversation.

Probing Question

The main job of the probing question, which follows main or follow-up question, is to clarify.

Here are a few examples of probing questions. Know them well and use them.
“Please tell me more.”

“Please give me an example.”

“Please help me understand.”

Besides probing questions you ask, you can also use silent probes.
  • Remain silent.
  • Nod your head.
  • Use a puzzled facial expression.


Prompts

A prompt is a cue or aide. Prompts aid recall by triggering a memory association.

Prompts help respondents talk about something you are interested in, but they have not talked about voluntarily.

Prompts can be brands, products, activities, names of things, and people.

For example,
“You mentioned Nokia. What about Samsung, LG, Motorola, and Sony Ericsson?”

Write prompts into the discussion guide. That way you won’t forget.
Write a list of probes in the focus group questionnaire. Rehearse them until you know them cold.
An effective interviewer asks main questions, follow-up questions, probes, and prompts. They dig beyond top-of- mind answers. They expand and get important details.

Practice

Make the four-question sequence part of your routine. Write the four-question sequence in the focus group questionnaire or moderator's guide, until you become comfortable. Practice it. Master it.

With enough practice, you’ll be able to improvise the four-question sequence on the spot. A jazz musician practices scales routinely. Improvisation comes from mastering the scales.

The same holds true for moderating. Master the four-question sequence and you’ll become skilled at improvising a directed conversation. Try it on friends and family.

Your interviewing skills will improve with practice. Moderating will become conversational.

Writing focus group questions in the moderator's guide or focus group questionnaire is your first step.

See the article about moderator guide. It illustrates how to order questions within a topic of inquiry.

Also, check out the article about basic question tips.

Once you learn basic questions, try laddering.

And try projective techniques.

Tuesday, 26 February 2013

Uses, gratifications and your work

The Uses and Gratifications Model of the Media

The mass media is a huge phenomenon. Through the various different platforms, print or broadcast, the media is able to reach millions of people like no other force. Without the media, powerful speeches by politicians would affect no one, local events would remain local, and performances by great actors would be seen only by the people in the immediate audience. The media overcomes distances, and builds a direct relationship with the audience. Many sociologists have attempted to explore what effects this has on society, and how the media fits in to our social network. Through many programmes of research, including focus groups, surveys, questionnaires, clinical studies and plain hypothesising, a number of models describing the media's relationship with audiences have been drawn up.
Initially, researchers approached the subject from the angle of how the media is able to manipulate audiences, injecting messages into their minds. This 'hypodermic' model, as it was later termed, became rejected after closer examination. The 'Uses and Gratifications' model represented a change in thinking, as researchers began to describe the effects of the media from the point of view of audiences. The model looks at the motives of the people who use the media, asking why we watch the television programmes that we do, why we bother to read newspapers, why we find ourselves so compelled to keep up to date with our favourite soap. The underlying idea behind the model is that people are motivated by a desire to fulfil, or gratify certain needs. So rather that asking how the media uses us, the model asks how we use the media.
The model is broken down into four different needs.
 
Surveillance
The surveillance need is based around the idea that people feel better having the feeling that they know what is going on in the world around them. One of the genres this is often applied to is news. By watching or reading about news we learn about what is happening in the world, and as the news is usually bad news, this knowledge leaves us feeling more secure about the safety of our own lives. This idea might seem a bit strange, that the more we know about tragedies the safer we feel, but sociologists argue that ignorance is seen as a source of danger, and so the more knowledge we have the safer we feel. When looking at the news it's easy to spot news items that give us this reaction. For example if it wasn't for watching the news we might be unknowingly left with five pound notes that are worthless1, or become vulnerable to the latest computer virus2, or end up in a hospital with an awful track record3.
It's not just news that fulfils the surveillance model however, the theory can also be seen in many consumer and crime-appeal programmes such as Watchdog4, Rogue Traders5 and CrimeWatch6. These appeal directly through the idea that they are imparting information that people need to know. The programmes talk far more directly to the viewer, and even try to get the viewer involved in the programme. Because these programmes deal purely with national and local concerns, without such vagaries as world news, the issues ostensibly have the potential to affect the viewer directly. By watching the programme we are finding out about which particular insurance companies are a con, how mobile phone muggings are taking place and the tricks plumbers use to charge us through the roof. This knowledge of life's potential pitfalls gives us the feeling that we are more able to avoid them (though in reality it's hard to see how this actually happens).
The surveillance model then is all about awareness. We use the mass media to be more aware of the world, gratifying a desire for knowledge and security.
 
Personal Identity
The personal identity need explains how being a subject of the media allows us to reaffirm the identity and positioning of ourselves within society. This can most be seen in soaps, which try to act as a microcosm of society as a whole. The characters in soaps are usually designed to have wildly different characteristics, so that everyone can find someone to represent themselves, someone to aspire to, and someone to despise. For example you might feel close to a character who is always falling victim to other people, and this connection might help you to understand and express your own feelings. You may also really like a character who seems 'cool' and leads a lifestyle you'd like to lead. This relationship could act as a way to channel your own life, helping you to set goals to work to. Finally there may be a character you really can't stand. By picking out their bad characteristics and decisions ('oh, she shouldn't have done that'), it helps you to define your own personal identity by marking out what you're not like...
The use of the media for forming personal identity can also be seen outside soaps. Sports personalities and pop stars can often become big role models, inspiring young children everywhere (which is why there's such an outcry when one of them does something wrong). Even the 'seriousness' of news can lend itself to gratifying personal identity, by treating news anchors as personalities, rather than simply figureheads relaying information:
Watching the news with my grandma is a nightmare. She's always commenting on the newsreader's clothing, hairdo or mannerisms.
Personal Relationships
This section comes in two parts. We can form a relationship with the media, and also use the media to form a relationship with others.

Relationships with the Media
Many people use the television as a form of companionship. This may seem sad, but think about how many times you've watched the TV on your own, or with other people but sitting in silence. The television is often quite an intimate experience, and by watching the same people on a regular basis we can often feel very close to them, as if we even know them. When presenters or characters in a soap die, those who have watched that person a lot often grieve for the character, as if they have lost a friend. Some events can even cause media outcries, such as the imprisonment of Deirdre from the TV soap Coronation Street, which caused many national newspapers to campaign for her release. We also talk to the TV a lot. Not many football fans can sit through a televised match without shouting at the players or the referee, and many people tell characters what to (or not to do) next.
Don't go down the stairs in your nightie! No don't open the door! No...!!!
The more we watch the same personalities, the more we feel we get to know them. Reality TV shows such as Big Brother give us such a feeling of intimacy with the participants that they can become part of our lives. Even though the relationship is completely one-sided, it's easy to see how we can fall in love with TV personalities.
Using the Media Within Relationships
Another aspect to the personal relationships model is how we can sometimes use the media as a springboard to form and build upon relationships with real people. The EastEnders strapline 'Everyone's talking about it', despite being a clever marketing tactic, does hold up when looking at social uses of the media. Having a favourite TV programme in common can often be the start of a conversation, and can even make talking to strangers that much easier. There's also some studies that suggest that some families use sitting around watching the television as a stimulus for conversation, talking to each other about the programme or related anecdotes while it is on. This kind of use (as well as some of the others), is heavily satirised in the BBC sit-com The Royle Family.
 
Diversion
The diversion need describes what's commonly termed as escapism - watching the television so we can forget about our own lives and problems for a while and think about something else. This can work with positive programmes, such as holiday shows or the constant happy endings in the Australian soap Neighbours, which help to cheer us up and forget our own problems, and with negative programmes, such as the bleak EastEnders or a tragic film, which help to put our own problems into perspective ('At least my life's not that bad!').
The diversion model also accounts for using the media for entertainment purposes, such as a good spy film, and for relaxation (slumping in front of the telly, don't care what's on). The media can give us emotional release and also sexual arousal, which includes a sexy scene in a film as well as pornography.
Altogether, the Uses and Gratifications model outlines the many reasons we have for using the mass media, and the kind of functions that the media can play within our lives.

Evaluating your work